Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward P. Stahel & Co., Inc. et al. v. United States; and United States v. Edward P. Stahel & Co., Inc. et al., 1949 — 336 U.S. 951 · caselaw · US
General
Edward P. Stahel & Co., Inc. et al. v. United States; and United States v. Edward P. Stahel & Co., Inc. et al.
336 U.S. 951·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Certiorari Denied.
(See also No. 649 and No. 443, Misc., supra.)
No. 490. No. 623.
Edward P. Stahel & Co., Inc. et al. v. United States; and United States v. Edward P. Stahel & Co., Inc. et al.
William A. Roberts and Irene Kennedy for petitioners in No. 490 and respondents in No. 623. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison and Paul A. Sweeney for the United States, respondent in No. 490; and Solicitor General Perlman for the United States, petitioner in No. 623.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.