Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Smith; and Doby v. Collins et al., 1960 — 364 U.S. 876 · caselaw · US
General
In re Smith; and Doby v. Collins et al.
364 U.S. 876·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 243,
Misc.
In re Smith; and Doby v. Collins et al.
No. 452,
Misc.
Petitioners pro se. Hilton A. Dickson, Jr., Attorney General of New Mexico, and Carl P. Dunifon, Mark C. Reno and Norman S. Thayer, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent in No. 243, Mise.
[MAJORITY]
Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.