Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arthur A. McLean, Respondent, v. Dennis Ryan, Appellant, 1900 — 165 N.Y. 620 · caselaw · US
General
Arthur A. McLean, Respondent, v. Dennis Ryan, Appellant
165 N.Y. 620·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arthur A. McLean, Respondent, v. Dennis Ryan, Appellant.
McLean v. Ryan, 36 App. Div. 281, affirmed.
(Argued November 26, 1900;
decided December 11, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of tEe Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 19, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
John W. Boothby for appellant.
John J. Delany for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O'Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ„