Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Benoit Wasserman, Appellant, v. Charles P. Bacon, Respondent, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 586 · caselaw · US
General
Benoit Wasserman, Appellant, v. Charles P. Bacon, Respondent
185 N.Y. 586·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Benoit Wasserman, Appellant, v. Charles P. Bacon, Respondent.
Wasserman v. Bacon, 105 App. Div. 632, affirmed.
(Argued May 22, 1906;
decided June 5, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 31, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to charge defendant as undisclosed principal for goods sold and delivered to his alleged agent.
Ira Leo Bamberger and Sidney Lowenthal for appellant.
David B. Hill, Edward S. Griffing and William F. McCombs, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.