General
Kaplysh et al. v. Hershey et al.; and Schwartz v. Local Board No. 23 et al.
394 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the stays should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 10, 1969.
No. —.
Misc.
No. 1637,
Kaplysh et al. v. Hershey et al.; and Schwartz v. Local Board No. 23 et al.
Ralph Rudd for applicants Kaplysh et al.
Solicitor General Griswold for respondents in each case in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Applications for stays of induction presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the stays should be granted.