Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bradley Mining Co. v. Boice, 1953 — 345 U.S. 932 · caselaw · US
General
Bradley Mining Co. v. Boice
345 U.S. 932·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 648,
October Term, 1951.
Bradley Mining Co. v. Boice.
John Parks Davis, Oscar W. Worthwine and Arthur B. Dunne for petitioner.
William H. Langroise for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
On petition for rehearing.
Per Curiam:
The petition for rehearing is granted. The order entered May 5, 1952, denying certiorari, 343 U. S. 941, is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The order of the division of the Court of Appeals denying petition for rehearing en banc is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in the light of Western Pacific Railroad Corp. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co., 345 U. S. 247, decided April 6, 1953.