Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Marie J. J. FLEITMANN and Thomas Crimmins, Executors of Estate of Herman C. Fleitmann, Deceased, Appellants, v. David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee, 1933 — 65 F.2d 179 · caselaw · US
Tax
Marie J. J. FLEITMANN and Thomas Crimmins, Executors of Estate of Herman C. Fleitmann, Deceased, Appellants, v. David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee
65 F.2d 179·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marie J. J. FLEITMANN and Thomas Crimmins, Executors of Estate of Herman C. Fleitmann, Deceased, Appellants, v. David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee.
No. 5657.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued Feb. 17, 1933.
Decided April 3, 1933.
Howe P. Cochran, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
G. A. Youngquist, Sewall Key, Morton K. Rothschild, C. M. Charest, and Bruce A. Low, all of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — GRONER, Associate Justice.]
GRONER, Associate Justice.
The appeal in this ease involves income taxes for the year 1919 in the amount of $14,-826.50, and is taken from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. The taxpayer’s returns for the calendar years 1910, 1920, and 1921 were filed, respectively, on March 15 of each succeeding year. Waivers were asked by the commissioner and filed by the taxpayer in much the same manner as in Fleitmann & Crimmins, Executors, v. Commissioner, 62 App. D. C. 88, 65 F.(2d) 176, and Fleitmann v. Commissioner, 62 App. D. C. 90, 65 F.(2d) 178, decided this day. The basis o£ the appeal here, as in those eases, is that the waivers are invalid because the commissioner's name was not signed by him personally or by some person by him expressly authorized to sign his name. What is said in Fleitmann & Crimmins, Executors, v. Commissioner, supra, applies equally here, and in our view the grounds of appeal are without merit.
The decision of the Board is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.