Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William C. Veght, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Florence Slocum et al., Appellants, 1886 — 101 N.Y. 642 · caselaw · US
General
William C. Veght, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Florence Slocum et al., Appellants
101 N.Y. 642·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William C. Veght, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Florence Slocum et al., Appellants.
(Argued January 19, 1886;
decided January 26, 1886.)
Wm. B. Slocum for motion.
Andrew Fallon opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal granted unless within twenty days from order, the appellant furnishes the undertakings required by law, with $10 costs.
All concur.