Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New York v. Illinois et al., 1960 — 362 U.S. 908 · caselaw · US
General
New York v. Illinois et al.
362 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 4,
Original.
New York v. Illinois et al.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, Richard H. Shepp, Assistant Attorney General, and Randall J. Le Boeuj, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, for complainant.
Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General of Illinois, William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence J. Fenlon, Peter G. Kuh, George A. Lane, Joseph B. Fleming, Joseph H. Pleck and Thomas M. Thomas for defendants.
[MAJORITY]
The report of the Special Master is received and ordered filed. The motion of the complainant for leave to file a supplemental and amended complaint is granted and the defendants are allowed 45 days within which to file answers thereto.