Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John D. Herlihy, Appellant, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 584 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John D. Herlihy, Appellant
170 N.Y. 584·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John D. Herlihy, Appellant.
People v. Herlihy, 66 App. Div. 534, affirmed.
(Argued February 21, 1903;
decided March 7, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 6, 1901, which reversed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the city of New York sustaining a demurrer to an indictment against the defendant and overruled said demurrer.
Abram I. Elkus and Carlisle J. Gleason for appellant.
William, Travers Jerome, District Attorney (Howard 8. Gans of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on opinion below.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., O’Bbien, Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin and Vann, JJ.. Absent: Gbay, J.