Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1964 — 379 U.S. 4 · caselaw · US
General
ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
379 U.S. 4·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 131.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Bryce Rea, Jr., and Louis Lisman for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; W. G. Burnette for Lynchburg Traffic Bureau; Arthur A. Arsham and John J. C. Martin for National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al.; and John M. Cleary, John F. Donelan and Dickson R. Loos for National Industrial Traffic League, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.