Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Benjamin F. Hazelton, Appellant, v. Ellis Webster et al. Respondents, 1899 — 161 N.Y. 628 · caselaw · US
General
Benjamin F. Hazelton, Appellant, v. Ellis Webster et al. Respondents
161 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Benjamin F. Hazelton, Appellant, v. Ellis Webster et al. Respondents.
Hazleton v. Webster, 20 App. Div. 177, affirmed.
(Argued November 27, 1899;
decided December 15, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered August 9, 1897, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of- defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
C. Walter Artz and Frank Sullivan Smith for appellant.
August Becker for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.