Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pioneer News Service, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. et al., 1951 — 341 U.S. 929 · caselaw · US
General
Pioneer News Service, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. et al.
341 U.S. 929·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 464.
Pioneer News Service, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. et al.
Morris A. Shenker for appellant. G. Wallace Bates and F. Mark Garlinghouse for the Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.; and J. E. Taylor, Attorney General of Missouri, Robert R. Welborn and Arthur M. O’Keefe, Assistant Attorneys General, and Tyre W. Burton for the public Service Commission of Missouri, appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Dismissed on motion of counsel for the appellant.