Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
R. G. HARRISON, Receiver of the First National Bank of Henderson, Appellant, v. B. H. HICKS, Trustee, Mildred W. Purvis, Administratrix and Individually, The Fidelity and Casualty Company, C. W. Hargrove and J. H. Zollicoffer, Appellees, 1932 — 57 F.2d 1077 · caselaw · US
General
R. G. HARRISON, Receiver of the First National Bank of Henderson, Appellant, v. B. H. HICKS, Trustee, Mildred W. Purvis, Administratrix and Individually, The Fidelity and Casualty Company, C. W. Hargrove and J. H. Zollicoffer, Appellees
57 F.2d 1077·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
R. G. HARRISON, Receiver of the First National Bank of Henderson, Appellant, v. B. H. HICKS, Trustee, Mildred W. Purvis, Administratrix and Individually, The Fidelity and Casualty Company, C. W. Hargrove and J. H. Zollicoffer, Appellees.
No. 3293.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
April 29, 1932.
J. II. Bridgers, of Henderson, N. C., for appellant.
T. G. Stem, of Oxford, N. C., and R. G. KittroU and B. II. Perry, both of Henderson, N. C., and Robert Ruark, of Raleigh, N. C. (Perry & Kittrell, of Henderson, N. C., on tlie brief), for appellees.
Before PARKER, NORTIICOTT, and SOPER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The deerees of the court below are affirmed on the authority of Byers v. McAuley, 149 U. S. 608, 13 S. Ct. 906, 37 L. Ed. 867; Yonley v. Lavender, 21 Wall. 276, 22 L. Ed. 536; Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank, 215 U. S. 33, 44, 30 S. Ct. 10, 54 L. Ed. 80; Kline v. Burke Construction Co., 260 U. S. 226, 43 S. Ct. 79, 67 L. Ed. 226, 24 A. L. R. 1077; Covell v. Heyman, 111 U. S. 176, 4 S. Ct. 355, 28 L. Ed. 390, and First National Bank v. Purvis, 201 N. C. 753, 161 S. E. 386.
Affirmed.