Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacob P. Marshall et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant, 1872 — 48 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
General
Jacob P. Marshall et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant
48 N.Y. 660·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob P. Marshall et al., Respondents, v. The New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Submitted September 19, 1871;
decided January term, 1872.)
A. P. Zoning for the appellant.
E. G. Za/pham for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Hunt, 0., reads for affirmance.
All concur. Judgment affirmed, with costs.