Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wm. LOUGHLIN, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1932 — 57 F.2d 1080 · caselaw · US
General
Wm. LOUGHLIN, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
57 F.2d 1080·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wm. LOUGHLIN, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 4775.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 12, 1932.
Affirming decree 53 F.(2d) 128.
F. M. P. Pearse, of Newark, N. J., for appellants Loughlin & McCormick.
Benjamin Dowden, of Jersey City, N. J., and Joseph W. Henry, of Newark, N. J., for appellant Engel.
Phillip Forman, U. S. Atty., of Trenton, N. J., and Samuel Cohen, of Newark, N. J.,
• Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
It appearing on the argument of this case that there was no proof that the alcoholic content of the beer in question was illegal, the ease is reversed; and counsel in court having agreed that the case be set for trial in the District Court during the week beginning April 18, 1932, the record will be remanded with that direction.