General
Silas B. Moore, Respondent, v. Stephen Hoyt et al., Appellants
184 N.Y. 535·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Silas B. Moore, Respondent, v. Stephen Hoyt et al., Appellants.
Moore v. Hoyt, 95 App. Div. 620, affirmed.
(Argued January 30, 1906;
decided February 13, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered June 24, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Richard L. Hand and Robert Dornburgh for appellants.
J. Sanford Potter for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Not voting: Cullen, Ch. J. Not sitting: Chase, J.