Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert Boyd, Appellant, v. The New York Security and Trust Company, Defendant, and Lizzie H. Daily, as Executrix of Henry Daily, Jr., Deceased, Respondent, 1903 — 176 N.Y. 613 · caselaw · US
Securities
Robert Boyd, Appellant, v. The New York Security and Trust Company, Defendant, and Lizzie H. Daily, as Executrix of Henry Daily, Jr., Deceased, Respondent
176 N.Y. 613·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert Boyd, Appellant, v. The New York Security and Trust Company, Defendant, and Lizzie H. Daily, as Executrix of Henry Daily, Jr., Deceased, Respondent.
Boyd v. Daily, 85 App. Div. 581, affirmed.
(Argued November 17, 1903;
decided December 1, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 4, 1903, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of respondent herein entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Ed/ward W. S. Johnston for appellant.
Lyman E. Warren for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.