Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Boylan Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. The State of New York, Respondent, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 506 · caselaw · US
General
The Boylan Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. The State of New York, Respondent
174 N.Y. 506·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Boylan Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. The State of New York, Respondent.
Boylan Manfg. Go. v. State of New Toi'h, 72 App. Div. 628, affirmed.
(Argued February 16, 1903;
decided March 3, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 14, 1902, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing the plaintiff’s claim.
George W. Wingate for appellant.
John Cunneen and 8. 8. Taylor for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Cli. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Cullen, JJ.