Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission et al., 1982 — 457 U.S. 1132 · caselaw · US
General
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission et al.
457 U.S. 1132·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-1945.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions: Whether petitioners’ challenges to the provisions in the 1976 amendments to California’s Warren-Alquist Act, Cal. Pub. Res. Code Ann. §§ 25524.1(b) and 25524.2 (West 1977), which condition the construction of nuclear plants on findings by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission that adequate storage facilities and means of disposal are available for high-level nuclear waste, are ripe for judicial review, and whether §§ 25524.1(b) and 25524.2 are pre-empted by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 42 U. S. C. § 2011 et seq.