Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County et al. v. Bianchi et al., 1967 — 385 U.S. 1023 · caselaw · US
General
Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County et al. v. Bianchi et al.
385 U.S. 1023·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 491.
Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County et al. v. Bianchi et al.
Richard C. Cahn for appellees Sammis et al. on the motion.
Stanley S. Corwin for Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County, and Pierre G. Lundberg for Town of Southampton et al., appellants, in support of the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y. (Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 966.) Motion to remove case from summary calendar denied.