Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John E. O'Connor, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of Jones & O'Connor, Appellant, v. The City of New York et al., Respondents, 1903 — 174 N.Y. 517 · caselaw · US
Corporations
John E. O'Connor, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of Jones & O'Connor, Appellant, v. The City of New York et al., Respondents
174 N.Y. 517·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John E. O’Connor, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of Jones & O’Connor, Appellant, v. The City of New York et al., Respondents.
Jones v. City of New York, 60 App. Div. 161, affirmed.
(Argued February 26, 1903;
decided March 17, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May-14, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
James M. Gifford and John Mulholland for appellant.
George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoby and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.