Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, Appellant, v. Charles Salmon et al., Respondents, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 682 · caselaw · US
General
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, Appellant, v. Charles Salmon et al., Respondents
157 N.Y. 682·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, Appellant, v. Charles Salmon et al., Respondents.
United States L. Ins. Bo. v. Salmon, 91 Hun, 585, affirmed.
(Argued October 6, 1898;
decided October 25, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 24, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
Oliver P. Buel for appellant.
J. B. M. Stephens for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except O’Bbien and Haight, JJ., not voting.