Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AMERICAN BENTONITE CORPORATION, O. W. Smith, and J. Benjamin Ott v. CLARK EQUIPMENT CO. and Sialco, Inc., 1930 — 43 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
Corporations
AMERICAN BENTONITE CORPORATION, O. W. Smith, and J. Benjamin Ott v. CLARK EQUIPMENT CO. and Sialco, Inc.
43 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMERICAN BENTONITE CORPORATION, O. W. Smith, and J. Benjamin Ott v. CLARK EQUIPMENT CO. and Sialco, Inc.
No. 5454.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 7, 1930.
Chindahl, Parker & Carlson, of Chicago, Ill., and Frank E. Liverance, Jr., of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellants.
Knappen, Uhl & Bryant, of Grand Rapids, Mich., and H. M. Huxley, of Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Before DENISON and HICKS, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree of District Court affirmed.