Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Emily Bryant, Respondent, v. Louis J. Allen et al., Appellants, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 637 · caselaw · US
General
Emily Bryant, Respondent, v. Louis J. Allen et al., Appellants
166 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emily Bryant, Respondent, v. Louis J. Allen et al., Appellants.
Reported below, 54 App. Div. 500.
(Argued April 15, 1901;
decided April 23, 1901.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 7, 1900, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term and granting a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction to review the order of reversal herein, it being upon the facts and the law.
Ferdinand E. M. Bullowa for motion.
Abrann Kling opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.