Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph Brand, Respondent, v. Allen Brand et al., Appellants, 1872 — 48 N.Y. 675 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph Brand, Respondent, v. Allen Brand et al., Appellants
48 N.Y. 675·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Brand, Respondent, v. Allen Brand et al., Appellants.
(Argued September 28, 1871;
decided January term, 1872.)
Dependants were jointly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of §100; plaintiff was indebted to Edward Brand, one of the defendants, in an equal or greater amount. It was agreed, by parol, between plaintiff and Edward, that the debt due the former should be set off and applied upon the demand of the latter, and that the former’s claim be thereby canceled. Plaintiff brought this action to recover his demand. Held, that the agreement was not one. of sale or transfer, and was not within the provisions of the statute of frauds. (Gray and Leonard, CC., dissenting.)
D. K. Obiey for the appellants.
Lymam, Tremain for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Hunt, 0., reads for reversal.
Gray, C., for affirmance.
For reversal, Lott, Ch. C., Hunt and Earl, 00.
For affirmance, Gray and Leonard, CO.
Order of General Term reversed, and judgment, upon report of referee, affirmed, with costs.