General
Stephen Sanford et al., Respondents, v. John Claflin et al., Appellants
133 N.Y. 691·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stephen Sanford et al., Respondents, v. John Claflin etal., Appellants.
(Argued June 6, 1892;
decided June 17, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made February 2,1892, which affirmed an order of Special Term, striking out portions of defendants’ answer as redundant and irrelevant.
L. MgK. Garrison for appellants.
W. L. Van Denberg for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.