Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tinkoff et al. v. Gold, Trustee, et al., 1947 — 330 U.S. 820 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Tinkoff et al. v. Gold, Trustee, et al.
330 U.S. 820·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 832.
Tinkoff et al. v. Gold, Trustee, et al.
February 10, 1947.
Petitioners pro se. Robert Mack David for David Storage & Moving Co. et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
On consideration of the suggestion of a diminution of the record and a motion for a writ of certiorari in that relation, the motion for certiorari is denied. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is also denied.