Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al. v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., DIVISION OF ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL, et al., 1970 — 397 U.S. 820 · caselaw · US
General
ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al. v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., DIVISION OF ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL, et al.
397 U.S. 820·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Douglas concurs in the result.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al. v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., DIVISION OF ST. MARY’S HOSPITAL, et al.
No. 1379.
Decided May 4, 1970
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.
James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein for apellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U. S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U. S. 407.
Mr. Justice Douglas concurs in the result.