General
Abraham P. WAXMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Channing POLLOCK, Edgar Selwyn, and Arch Selwyn, Defendants-Respondents
24 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Abraham P. WAXMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Channing POLLOCK, Edgar Selwyn, and Arch Selwyn, Defendants-Respondents.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 5, 1928.
No. 178.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Rosenthal & Altman, of New York City (Davies, Auerbach & Cornell, of New York City, of counsel, and Milton S. Cohn, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
O’Brien, Malevinsky & Driscoll, of New York City (Arthur F. Driscoll and Benjamin Pepper, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondents.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed, with costs.