Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Joseph Barondess, Respondent, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Joseph Barondess, Respondent
133 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Joseph Barondess, Respondent.
(Argued April 19, 1892;
decided May 24, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 7, 1891, which reversed a judgment of the Court of Oyer and Terminer entered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of extortion.
Ilenry JB. B. Stapler for appellant.
Benjamim, Stemhart for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse and affirm judgment of conviction on opinion of Daniels, J., below.
Earl, Ch. J., Andrews, Finch and Peckham, JJ., concur. Gray, J., reads for affirmance; O’Brien and Maynard, JJ.s concur.
Judgment reversed.