Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Spaulding, an Infant, by Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Tucker & Carter Cordage Company, Respondent, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
General
John Spaulding, an Infant, by Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Tucker & Carter Cordage Company, Respondent
153 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Spaulding, an Infant, by Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Tucker & Carter Cordage Company, Respondent.
Spaulding v. T. & C. Cordage Co., 13 Misc. Rep. 398, affirmed.
(Argued May 6, 1897;
decided June 8, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered July 3, 1895, which overruled plaintiff’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance at General Term, and directed judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.
Charles J. Patterson for appellant.
Alfred B. Cruikshanlc and Henry G. Atwater for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.