Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Herbert D. NEFF, Appellant, 1975 — 521 F.2d 584 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Herbert D. NEFF, Appellant
521 F.2d 584·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Herbert D. NEFF, Appellant.
No. 75-1292.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 22, 1975.
Decided Sept. 4, 1975.
Herbert D. Neff, pro se.
Donald J. Stohr, U. S. Atty., and John Birkby, Sp. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for ap-pellee.
Before HEANEY, BRIGHT and ROSS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appeal of Herbert D. Neff is dismissed for his failure to file a timely notice of appeal. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 49(c). United States of America v. James Howard Ayers, No. 75-1462 (8th Cir. August 4, 1975).
Notwithstanding our lack of jurisdiction, we are satisfied that the sentence, which we are asked to set aside as being excessive, is within the statutory limits and is not otherwise shown to be arbitrary.