Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, et al., appellants, v. ALABAMA, et al., 2014 — 134 S. Ct. 2695 · caselaw · US
General
ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, et al., appellants, v. ALABAMA, et al.
134 S. Ct. 2695189 L. Ed. 2d 739·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, et al., appellants,
v.
ALABAMA, et al.
No. 13-895.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 2, 2014.
Case below, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 6925681.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. In this case probable jurisdiction noted limited to Question 2 presented by the statement as to jurisdiction in No. 13-895 and Question 1 presented by the statement as to jurisdiction in No. 13-1138. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.