Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Holt et al. v. Kirby et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 930 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Holt et al. v. Kirby et al.
393 U.S. 930·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Fortas and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 12, 1968.
No. 132,
October Term, 1965.
Holt et al. v. Kirby et al.,
Robert L. Bobrick on the motion.
John E. Tobin and Benjamin Vinar for Kirby et al., and Mark F. Hughes and Vincent R. Fitzpatrick for Alleghany Corp., in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
384 U. S. 28, 967. Motion of Morris Smith et al. to recall and amend judgment in this case denied.
Mr. Justice Fortas and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.