Corporations
Catherine J. Fanning, Respondent, v. The Supreme Council of the Catholic Mutual Benefit Association, Respondent, and Hanora Dalton, Appellant
178 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine J. Fanning, Respondent, v. The Supreme Council of the Catholic Mutual Benefit Association, Respondent, and Hanora Dalton, Appellant.
Fanning-?. Supreme Council, C. M. B. A., 84 App. Div. 205, affirmed.
(Argued May 11, 1904;
decided May 31, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 12, 1903, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of defendant Dalton entered upon a decision of the couru on trial at Special Term.
Julius M. Mayer and Abraham S. Gilbert for appellant.
James Kea/rneij for plaintiff, respondent.
J. Arthur Corbin and John J. Hynes for defendant, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
. Judgment affirmed, with costs to the defendant corporation only, payable out of the fund; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Cli. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin; Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.