Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William T. Hart et al., Respondents, v. The Ogdensburg and Lake Champlain Railroad Company et al., Appellants; Same, Respondents, v. Same, Appellants, 1893 — 139 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
William T. Hart et al., Respondents, v. The Ogdensburg and Lake Champlain Railroad Company et al., Appellants; Same, Respondents, v. Same, Appellants
139 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William T. Hart et al., Respondents, v. The Ogdensburg and Lake Champlain Railroad Company et al., Appellants. Same, Respondents, v. Same, Appellants.
(Argued October 16, 1893;
decided October 27, 1893.)
These were separate appeals by defendants from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made May 9,1893, which affirmed an order of Special Term permitting plaintiffs after issues joined to have a discovery and inspection of books and papers of defendants.
John C. Keeler and Louis Hasbrouck for appellants.
Charles O. Tappan for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeals; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeals dismissed.