Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Louisiana et al., 1959 — 361 U.S. 872 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Louisiana et al.
361 U.S. 872·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
The Chief Justice- and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 26, 1959.
No. 10,
Original.
United States v. Louisiana et al.
Price Daniel, Governor of Texas, Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, James N. Lud-lum, First Assistant Attorney. General, Houghton Brown-lee, Jr., James H. Rogers and John Flowers, Assistant Attorneys General, James P. Hart, J. Chrys Dougherty and Robert J. Hearon, Jr. for the State of Texas.
[MAJORITY]
The motion of the State of Texas for leave to file a supplemental brief is granted.
The Chief Justice- and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.