Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Walker v. Honyaouma; Forney v. Florida; Parrish v. Nevada; Smith et ux. v. Regions Bank et al.; Smith et ux. v. Atlantic Southern Bank et al. (three judgments); Conwill v. Mississippi; Mitchell v. Dallas Housing Authority; Carey v. Roy, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections, et al.; Hallford v. Mendez et al.; Cedrins v. Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois; Cedrins v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Concepcion v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al., In re Decker-Wegener, Abulkhair v. New Century Financial Services, Inc., 2012 — 565 U.S. 1185 · caselaw · US