Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
TOWER MANUFACTURING CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO CHEMICAL WORKS, Defendant, 1929 — 33 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
General
TOWER MANUFACTURING CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO CHEMICAL WORKS, Defendant
33 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Before MANTON,' L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TOWER MANUFACTURING CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO CHEMICAL WORKS, Defendant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 17, 1929.
No. 346.
Prindle, Wright, Neal & Bean, of New York City' (Edwin J. Prindle and Chester H. Biesterfeld, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff:.
Wood, Molloy & France, of New York City (Melville J. France, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.
Before MANTON,' L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.