Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ADAMS, PAYNE & GLEAVES, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, 1929 — 31 F.2d 1006 · caselaw · US
Tax
ADAMS, PAYNE & GLEAVES, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
31 F.2d 1006·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1929
Before WADDILL, Circuit Judge, and McDOWELL and SOPER, District Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ADAMS, PAYNE & GLEAVES, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
April 9, 1929.
No. 2806.
H. H. Shelton, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Millar E. McGilchrist, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen. (Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Louis Monarch and Randolph C. • Shaw, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., and C. M. Char-est, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and D. Y. Hunter, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before WADDILL, Circuit Judge, and McDOWELL and SOPER, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the judgment of the Board of Tax Appeals, and it is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.