Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Victor Koechl and Company, Appellant, v. William J. Morgan, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent, 1906 — 183 N.Y. 574 · caselaw · US
Tax
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Victor Koechl and Company, Appellant, v. William J. Morgan, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent
183 N.Y. 574·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Victor Koechl and Company, Appellant, v. William J. Morgan, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.
(Argued January 9, 1906;
decided January 23, 1906.)
People ex rel. Koechl & Co. v. Morgan, 96 App. Div. 110, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 23, 1904, which modified and affirmed as modified a determination of the defendant assessing a franchise tax upon the relator.
Edmund L. Cole for appellant.
Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-General (Horace McGuire of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.