Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Semerio et al. v. Rosenberg et al., 1943 — 320 U.S. 770 · caselaw · US
General
Semerio et al. v. Rosenberg et al.
320 U.S. 770·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 322, 323, and 324.
Semerio et al. v. Rosenberg et al.
October 18, 1943.
Mr. Milton D. Sapiro for petitioners. Mr. Herbert W. Erskine for respondents. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Douglas B. Maggs filed a brief on behalf of the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Dept, of Labor, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.