Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ferdinand Eidman, Collector, etc., Petitioner, v. Frederick B. Tilghman et al., Executors, etc., 1906 — 203 U.S. 580 · caselaw · US
General
Ferdinand Eidman, Collector, etc., Petitioner, v. Frederick B. Tilghman et al., Executors, etc.
203 U.S. 580·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 208.
Ferdinand Eidman, Collector, etc., Petitioner, v. Frederick B. Tilghman et al., Executors, etc.
Argued October 15, 1906.
Decided October 29, 1906.
The Attorney General, The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Robb for petitioner. Mr. Edward B. Whitney for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs by a divided court and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.