Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The New York City Central Underground Railway Company, Appellant, et al., Respondents, 1891 — 129 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The New York City Central Underground Railway Company, Appellant, et al., Respondents
129 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The New York City Central Underground Railway Company, Appellant, et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 19, 1891;
decided December 1, 1891.)
’ Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department made June 26, 1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion, to strike out amended complaint and discontinue action.
Edward Winslow Paige for appellant.
David J. Dean, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.