Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United Land Association et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lewis Abrahams et al., 1908 — 208 U.S. 614 · caselaw · US
General
United Land Association et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lewis Abrahams et al.
208 U.S. 614·Supreme Court of the United States·1908
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 5 and 4.
United Land Association et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lewis Abrahams et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Argued January 29, 1908.
Decided February 24, 1908.
Mr. Charles A. Keigwin and Mr. John G. Johnson for plaintiffs in error. Mr. W. B. Treadwell, Mr. Charles H. Lovell and Mr. P. F. Dunne for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgments affirmed with costs. Knight v. United Land Association, 142 U. S. 161; San Francisco City and County v. Le Roy, 138 U. S. 656; case below, 139 California, 370.