Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Duggan v. O'Grady, Warden, 1942 — 315 U.S. 799 · caselaw · US
General
Duggan v. O'Grady, Warden
315 U.S. 799·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 801.
Duggan v. O’Grady, Warden.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska. February 2, 1942. Neil Olson, present Warden of the Nebraska State Penitentiary, substituted as the party respondent in the place and stead of Joseph O’Grady, resigned, on motion of the petitioner. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.