Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Fox et al.; Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Parks et al.; and Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Eder, Executrix, 1943 — 320 U.S. 792 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Fox et al.; Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Parks et al.; and Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Eder, Executrix
320 U.S. 792·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Mr. Justice Reel took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 402.
No. 403.
No. 404.
Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Fox et al.; Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Parks et al.; and Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, v. Eder, Executrix.
November 22, 1943.
Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. J. Kennard Cheadle for petitioner. Messrs. Stephen E. Chaffee and Wm. G. Feely for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Mr. Justice Reel took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Reported below: 137 F. 2d 30.