Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Board of Education of the North Little Rock, Arkansas, School District, et al. v. Davis et al., 1982 — 459 U.S. 881 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Board of Education of the North Little Rock, Arkansas, School District, et al. v. Davis et al.
459 U.S. 881·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Justice Rehnquist would grant certiorari for the reasons set forth in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Board of Education of North Little Rock v. Davis, 454 U. S. 904 (1981). JUSTICE Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-2316.
Board of Education of the North Little Rock, Arkansas, School District, et al. v. Davis et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Rehnquist would grant certiorari for the reasons set forth in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Board of Education of North Little Rock v. Davis, 454 U. S. 904 (1981). JUSTICE Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.