Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Annette Moran, Respondent, v. J. Lee Morrill, as Executor of and Trustee under the Will of Edward Moran, Deceased, Appellant, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 563 · caselaw · US
General
Annette Moran, Respondent, v. J. Lee Morrill, as Executor of and Trustee under the Will of Edward Moran, Deceased, Appellant
177 N.Y. 563·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Annette Moran, Respondent, v. J. Lee Morrill, as Executor of and Trustee under the Will of Edward Moran, Deceased, Appellant.
Moran v. Morrill, 78 App. Div. 440, affirmed.
(Argued January 7, 1904;
decided January 26, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 24,1903, which reversed a judgment of nonsuit and an order denying a motion for the entry of a general verdict in favor of plaintiff on a special verdict and directed judgment for plaintiff. ■
James Harold Warner and Charles C. Beiley for appellant.
Theodore Sutro for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, J.